Grotabyte
Ingest & Capture

Archiving Microsoft365 Google Workspace Patterns Pitfalls

18 September 2025By Bilal Ahmed

Introduction

Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace dominate enterprise collaboration, providing tools for email, chat, documents, and shared drives. While these platforms boost productivity, they also create challenges for archiving and compliance. Organizations must navigate unique patterns and pitfalls when capturing and preserving data from these ecosystems. This blog highlights best practices for archiving Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace effectively.

Key Patterns in Archiving Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace

1. API-Driven Ingestion

  • Both platforms expose APIs (Microsoft Graph, Google APIs) to capture emails, chats, files, and calendar events.
  • APIs provide rich metadata, enabling classification and retention tagging.

2. Journaling for Email

  • Microsoft 365 supports journaling for capturing all inbound/outbound emails.
  • Journaling ensures defensible preservation but may not cover Teams or SharePoint data.

3. Multi-Source Capture

  • Effective archiving requires capturing across Exchange Online, Teams, OneDrive, SharePoint (Microsoft), and Gmail, Drive, Chat, Meet (Google).
  • Hybrid strategies often combine journaling for email with APIs for collaboration data.

4. Retention and Disposition Policies

  • Native compliance features (e.g., Microsoft Purview, Google Vault) provide retention and eDiscovery but may not meet all regulatory requirements.
  • Third-party archives extend retention, legal hold, and cross-platform search.

Common Pitfalls

1. Incomplete Coverage

  • Microsoft 365: Journaling covers email but misses Teams chats, channel messages, and files unless captured via APIs.
  • Google Workspace: Vault retention may not cover all file metadata or third-party integrations.

2. API Limitations

  • Rate limits, throttling, and API deprecations can disrupt ingestion.
  • Some data (e.g., edits, reactions in chats) may not be fully captured.

3. Over-Reliance on Native Tools

  • Purview and Vault are powerful but lack advanced classification, cross-platform search, or non-SaaS integration.
  • Relying solely on them can leave compliance gaps.

4. Retention Conflicts

  • Default retention settings may conflict with regulatory schedules, leading to over-retention or premature deletion.

5. Legal Hold Complexity

  • Applying and lifting holds across multiple services (Teams + SharePoint + Exchange) can create administrative challenges.

Best Practices

  1. Adopt a Hybrid Strategy: Use journaling for email compliance and APIs for collaboration data.
  2. Audit Data Sources: Regularly validate that all services (Teams, SharePoint, Drive, Chat) are included.
  3. Plan for API Changes: Monitor vendor updates and adjust ingestion workflows proactively.
  4. Integrate Third-Party Archives: Enhance native tools with advanced retention, classification, and federated search.
  5. Test eDiscovery Workflows: Ensure archived data supports legal holds, search, and export for investigations.

Conclusion

Archiving Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace requires careful planning to avoid compliance and governance pitfalls. By combining journaling, APIs, and third-party solutions, organizations can ensure comprehensive coverage, defensible retention, and readiness for audits or litigation. A thoughtful strategy transforms SaaS archiving from a compliance challenge into a governance advantage.